Digital legacy The conversation When someone dies
Review methodology

How We Review

Every product and service GoodLeaving reviews is evaluated against the same criteria, using the same scoring system. This page explains how that works — so you can judge how much weight to give our ratings.

Last updated: April 2026

Our approach

The end-of-life planning category is poorly served by most consumer review sites. Products are often evaluated superficially, scores are inflated, and affiliate relationships go undisclosed. We built our review methodology to address those shortcomings directly.

Every GoodLeaving review is structured around five criteria that we believe matter most to the people likely to use the product. The criteria are weighted differently depending on what they are — ease of use counts for more than brand reputation, because ease of use is what determines whether someone actually completes the task.

We do not accept payment for reviews or for inclusion in comparison tables. Our scores are our honest assessment.

The scoring system

Each criterion is scored from 1.0 to 5.0 in increments of 0.5. The overall score is a weighted average of the five criteria scores, rounded to one decimal place.

A high overall score does not mean a product is right for everyone. Every review includes a “Best for / Not right for” section that explains specifically which situations the product suits — and which it doesn’t. We believe this is more useful than a score alone.

How we test

Where possible, we use products directly. For will-writing services this means going through the full process up to but not including signing — so we can evaluate the questions, the interface, the output, and the instructions provided. For password managers we test the emergency access workflow. For probate services we evaluate the intake process and documentation requirements.

Where direct testing is not practical or appropriate, we evaluate based on:

  • Publicly available product documentation and terms
  • Verified customer feedback from regulated review platforms
  • Published pricing and feature comparisons
  • Direct contact with the service’s support team to assess responsiveness

We note clearly in each review which approach we used and where our assessment is based on indirect evaluation.

Keeping reviews current

Pricing changes. Products update. Services improve or deteriorate. We review every published review on a rolling 6-month basis and update scores and content when material changes occur. Every review carries a “Last reviewed” date so you know how current the assessment is.

If you’ve used a service we’ve reviewed and your experience differs significantly from our assessment, we want to hear from you. Contact us at editorial@goodleaving.com.

Categories we currently review

  • Will writing services — online and hybrid
  • Password managers with estate planning features
  • Probate services
  • Funeral plan providers (coming soon)
  • Lasting Power of Attorney services (coming soon)

We add new categories when we have sufficient knowledge to evaluate them properly and when they are directly relevant to our audience’s needs.

The five scoring criteria

All products in the will writing, probate, and estate planning categories are scored on these five dimensions. The same criteria apply consistently so scores are comparable across reviews in the same category.

01
Ease of use
How straightforward is the product to understand and use? Does it guide the user clearly? Are the questions well-written and free of jargon? Does the process feel manageable, or overwhelming? This is the most heavily weighted criterion because a product that people can't actually use is not a useful product, regardless of its other qualities.
Weight: 25%
02
Value for money
Does the price reflect what you actually get? We compare like-for-like — accounting for what is included and what is an add-on. A higher-priced product that includes more may represent better value than a cheaper product where essential features cost extra. We assess the real cost of getting a complete, legally sound output.
Weight: 20%
03
Legal robustness
Is the output legally sound? Does the process account for common edge cases? Is there access to qualified legal review, either included or available? We pay attention to whether the product handles complexity gracefully or redirects it, and whether the final document would withstand scrutiny.
Weight: 25%
04
Customer support
What happens when something goes wrong or a question arises? Is support accessible, responsive, and genuinely helpful? For products people use at a stressful time in their lives, the quality of support is not a minor consideration. We evaluate documented support experience, available contact methods, and response quality where we can assess it.
Weight: 15%
05
Digital legacy coverage
Does the product acknowledge and address digital legacy — passwords, online accounts, crypto assets, digital wishes — as part of the planning process? This is a relatively new criterion and many products score poorly on it. We include it because digital legacy is central to GoodLeaving's purpose and increasingly important to the people we serve.
Weight: 15%